GRI G4 Content Index
KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft has provided limited assurance. You can find the Independent Assurance Report in the Assurance Report ![]()
Strategy and Analysis
G4 Indicators |
Links within this report |
External links |
Comments |
|
Strategy and Analysis |
||||
G4-1 |
Statement from the Chairman of the Executive Board |
|
Annual Report 2015/16: |
|
Organizational Profile
G4 Indicators |
Links within this report |
External links |
Comments |
|
Organizational Profile |
||||
G4-3 |
Name of the organization |
|
|
|
G4-4 |
Primary brands, products, and services |
|
Annual Report 2015/16: |
|
G4-5 |
Location of the organization’s headquarters |
|
|
|
G4-6 |
Countries with significant operations |
|
Annual Report 2015/16: |
|
|
||||
G4-7 |
Nature of ownership and legal form |
|
Annual Report 2015/16: |
|
|
||||
G4-8 |
Markets served |
|
Annual Report 2015/16: |
|
|
||||
G4-9 |
Scale of the organization |
|
Annual Report 2015/16: |
The METRO GROUP sales lines stock the products of renowned manufacturers and own-brand products that combine high quality with attractive prices. In Germany, for example, the entire product range comprises approximately 190,000 items at Real and approximately 135,000 at METRO Cash & Carry, as well as some 270,000 items online at Media Markt and 200,000 items online at Saturn. |
|
||||
G4-10 |
Employees by employment type, gender and region |
|
With legislation varying across the various countries in which METRO GROUP operates, information regarding the proportion of temporary employment contracts has no informative value. |
|
G4-11 |
Percentage of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements |
|
|
The percentage of employees represented by an independent trade union or whose interests are covered by collective bargaining agreements is approximately 70 per cent. |
G4-12 |
Description of the supply chain |
|
As a company in the retail and wholesale business, our supply chain can be represented as follows in simplified terms: manufacturers, growers and producers of food and non-food items; transport, storage and distribution; stores; consumers. |
|
G4-13 |
Significant changes during the reporting period |
|
Annual Report 2015/16: |
With regard to our purchasing processes, we take care to ensure that we are not dependent on our suppliers. There have therefore not been any significant changes in our supplier structure. As a result, we do not report on changes in the location of suppliers, the structure of the supply chain or relationships with suppliers (including their selection and the termination of such relationships). |
G4-14 |
Implementation of the precautionary principle |
|
|
|
G4-15 |
External initiatives that the organization endorses |
|
|
|
G4-16 |
Significant memberships in industry and business associations |
|
|
|
Identified Material Aspects and Boundaries
G4 Indicators |
Links within this report |
External links |
Comments |
|
Identified Material Aspects and Boundaries |
||||
G4-17 |
Entities included in the consolidated financial statements |
|
Annual Report 2015/16: |
The METRO GROUP Corporate Responsibility Report 2015/16 covers all the key operational units, including the sales lines, service companies and back offices. The respective scope of application is also noted for the indicators. |
|
||||
G4-18 |
Process for defining the report content |
|
|
|
G4-19 |
Material Aspects identified |
|
|
|
G4-20 |
Aspect Boundaries within the organization |
|
|
|
G4-21 |
Aspect Boundaries outside the organization |
|
|
|
G4-22 |
Restatemtents of information provided in previous reports |
|
|
In the event of restatements of information compared with earlier reports, these are explained by means of footnotes in the relevant places. |
G4-23 |
Significant changes in the Scope and Aspect Boundaries |
|
Annual Report 2015/16: |
Should there be any important changes to the scope of the report and the delineation of individual aspects, these are explained by means of footnotes in the relevant places. |
Stakeholder Engagement
G4 Indicators |
Links within this report |
External links |
Comments |
|
Stakeholder Engagement |
||||
G4-24 |
Stakeholder groups engaged |
|
|
|
G4-25 |
Identification and selection of stakeholders |
|
|
|
G4-26 |
Approach to stakeholder engagement and frequency |
|
|
|
G4-27 |
Key topics and concerns raised through stakeholder engagement and response |
|
|
|
Report Profile |
||||
G4-28 |
Reporting period |
|
|
|
G4-29 |
Date of most recent previous report |
|
|
|
G4-30 |
Reporting cycle |
|
|
|
G4-31 |
Contact point for questions regarding the report |
|
|
|
G4-32 |
“In accordance” option with GRI and Content Index chosen |
|
|
|
G4-33 |
External verification of the report |
|
The scope of the independent external assurance engagement according to ISAE 3000 and ISAE 3410 by KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft is described in the independent assurance report, which can be found under Assurance Report. It was not part of the engagement to review product and service related information, references to external websites and information sources, as well as future-related statements in the Report. |
|
Governance |
||||
G4-34 |
Governance structure, incl. committees of the highest governance body |
|
Annual Report 2015/16: |
|
|
||||
Ethics and Integrity
G4 Indicators |
Links within this report |
External links |
Comments |
|
Ethics and Integrity |
||||
G4-56 |
Organisation’s values, principles, standards and norms of behaviour |
|
|
|
Annual Report 2015/16: |
||||
|
||||
Economic Performance
G4 Indicators |
Links within this report |
External links |
Comments |
|
Economic Performance |
||||
Management approach |
|
Annual Report 2015/16: |
|
|
Economy |
||||
G4-EC1 |
Direct economic value created and distributed |
|
Annual Report 2015/16: |
For competition law reasons, we do not report in detail on the economic value generated and distributed separately for the national, regional or store levels. |
G4-EC2 |
Financial implications and other risks and opportunities due to climate change |
Annual Report 2015/16: |
Since 2006, we have been publishing information on the risks and opportunities resulting from climate change with our participation in the CDP climate change survey. Based on this, we were once again named Sector Leader in Consumer Staples, and Index Leader on the German MDAX, in 2016. |
|
G4-EC3 |
Coverage of benefit plan obligations |
|
Disclosures on G4-EC3 a-e can be found on the following pages: |
Due to the different pension systems, it is not possible to separate the pension contributions of employers and employees. |
Annual Report 2015/16: |
||||
33. Provisions for post-employment benefits plans and similar obligations |
||||
Procurement Practices |
||||
G4-EC9 |
Proportion of spending on local suppliers |
|
|
We are currently working on a definition of “local suppliers” and on the corresponding data collection. As a result, we are not yet reporting on this indicator. |
Environmental Performance
G4 Indicators |
Links within this report |
External links |
Comments |
|
Environmental Performance |
||||
Management approach |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Energy |
||||
G4-EN3 |
Energy consumption within the organization |
|
We do not sell significant volumes of energy to third parties. The consumption figures for the individual energy sources are converted into MWh on the basis of the usual standard factors. |
|
G4-EN5 |
Energy intensity |
|
The energy intensity KPI comprises energy consumption within the organisation only. |
|
G4-EN6 |
Reduction of energy consumption |
|
|
|
METRO Cash & Carry – Energy efficiency and energy conservation |
||||
Water |
||||
G4-EN8 |
Total water withdrawal by source |
|
|
|
Emissions |
||||
G4-EN15 |
Direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 1) |
|
The greenhouse gas KPIs are reported in the form of carbon equivalents and comprise all the Kyoto gases. |
|
G4-EN16 |
Energy indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 2) |
|
The greenhouse gas KPIs are reported in the form of carbon equivalents and comprise all the Kyoto gases. |
|
G4-EN17 |
Other indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 3) |
|
The greenhouse gas KPIs are reported in the form of carbon equivalents and comprise all the Kyoto gases. |
|
G4-EN18 |
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity |
|
|
|
G4-EN19 |
Reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions |
|
|
|
Trends in the emission sources included in the climate protection target |
||||
Effluents and Waste |
||||
G4-EN22 |
Total water discharge by quality and destination |
|
|
|
G4-EN23 |
Total weight of waste by type and disposal method |
|
The waste disposal method is determined on the basis of information provided by the disposal service providers we use. |
|
Transport |
||||
G4-EN30 |
Significant environmental impacts of transporting products |
|
During financial year 2015/16, we identified the following activities/consumptions for shipments: |
|
Company cars: 25.6 million litres of fuel |
||||
This results in the following carbon emissions (carbon equivalents): 2.5 million tonnes of carbon |
||||
Societal Performance – Labor Practices and Decent Work
G4 Indicators |
Links within this report |
External links |
Comments |
|
Societal Performance: |
||||
Labor Practices and Decent Work |
||||
Management approach |
Annual Report 2015/16: |
|
||
Employment |
Annual Report 2015/16: |
|
||
G4-LA1 |
New employee hires and employee turnover |
|
|
|
Labor/Management Relations |
Annual Report 2015/16: |
|
||
Occupational Health and Safety |
Annual Report 2015/16: |
|
||
G4-LA5 |
Percentage of total workforce represented in health and safety committees |
|
|
An Occupational Health and Safety Circle will be established in every country in which METRO GROUP is active by 2017. The proportion of employees already represented by these OHS Circles in 2015 was more than 44 per cent. |
G4-LA6 |
Injuries, occupational diseases, lost days, and work-related fatalities |
|
We report on the KPIs which are significant to us. The types of accident and the underlying causes are evaluated by us internally in order for us to derive appropriate precautionary measures. This internal data collection also includes contractor accidents. |
|
Training and Education |
Annual Report 2015/16: |
|
||
G4-LA9 |
Average hours of training |
|
A breakdown by gender and employee groups is not relevant for us and is therefore not published. |
|
Diversity and Equal Opportunity |
Annual Report 2015/16: |
|
||
G4-LA12 |
Composition of governance bodies and breakdown of employees by aspects of diversity |
|
|
|
Supplier Assessment for Labor Practices |
|
|||
G4-LA14 |
Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using labor practices criteria |
|
It is not currently possible to specify a percentage, due to the fact that data for new suppliers are not collected separately. Such data collection is planned for the future. |
|
Otherwise, all the suppliers of non-food own-brand products who produce goods (or have goods produced) in risk countries are obliged to name their respective producers and to present valid audits for all of them. It is only possible to carry out a new listing of suppliers if a valid BSCI audit (or equivalent) is presented with an acceptable result for the specific producer (see also the METRO GROUP internal policy). |
||||
G4-LA15 |
Significant impacts for labor practices in the supply chain |
|
a) All non-food own-brand producers used by us with a valid audit. At the reporting date of 30 September 2016, this was a total of 1,632 producers. |
|
b) Of these, the number of producers with a deal breaker result. In financial year 2015/16, this was a total of 195 producers. |
||||
c) A deal breaker result encompasses the aspects of child labour, forced labour, occupational health and safety – especially fire safety – and ethical behaviour. |
||||
d) Within the framework of the deal breaker process, non-food own-brand producers with a deal breaker result are obliged to rectify any shortcomings within six weeks. Until such time as the producer is able to prove that the shortcomings have been rectified and that they have sustainably improved their organisational processes, they will not receive any further orders. In financial year 2015/16, 12 per cent of non-food own-brand producers produced a deal breaker result. |
||||
e) In financial year 2015/16, 26 per cent of producers with a deal breaker result were unable to satisfactorily modify their organisational processes and were therefore temporarily blocked from receiving any further orders. |
||||
Societal Performance – Human Rights
G4 Indicators |
Links within this report |
External links |
Comments |
|
Societal Performance: |
||||
Human Rights |
||||
Management approach |
|
Annual Report 2015/16: |
|
|
Investment |
||||
G4-HR2 |
Employee training on human rights issues |
|
|
|
Child Labor |
||||
G4-HR5 |
Operations and suppliers having significant risk for incidents of child labor, and measures taken |
|
|
a) + b) All non-food own-brand producers (Tier 1) in a risk country with a BSCI audit result of C, D, E, Zero Tolerance, Improvement Needed or Non-Compliant are subjected to a concrete audit regarding risks in the area of child labour. In financial year 2015/16, this was a total of 1,227 producers. |
c) In financial year 2015/16, no child labour was identified among any of the audited producers. As a result of insufficient processes for the reliable avoidance of child labour, 16 producers were subjected to measures for reducing this risk, including support in adapting internal producer processes, BSCI training programmes and/or re-audits. |
||||
Furthermore, our producers are obliged to continually improve their audit results within the framework of the BSCI standard process. Producers whose audit results identified a need for improvement have twelve months to provide proof of those improvements through a follow-up audit. As of 1 January 2017, METRO Cash & Carry and Real will tighten the requirements for suppliers such that new producers will only be used if their audit results are at least acceptable. A two-year transitional period will apply to current producers. |
||||
Forced or Compulsory Labor |
||||
G4-HR6 |
Operations and suppliers having significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor, and measures taken |
|
|
a) + b) All non-food own-brand producers (Tier 1) in a risk country with a BSCI audit result of C, D, E, Zero Tolerance, Improvement Needed or Non-Compliant are subjected to a concrete audit regarding risks in the area of forced labour. In financial year 2015/16, this was a total of 1,227 producers. |
c) In financial year 2015/16, no forced labour was identified among any of the audited producers. As a result of insufficient processes for the reliable avoidance of forced labour, five producers were subjected to measures for reducing this risk, including support in adapting internal producer processes, BSCI training programmes and/or re-audits. |
||||
Furthermore, our producers are obliged to continually improve their audit results within the framework of the BSCI standard process. Producers whose audit results identified a need for improvement have twelve months to provide proof of those improvements through a follow-up audit. As of 1 January 2017, METRO Cash & Carry and Real will tighten the requirements for suppliers such that new producers will only be used if their audit results are at least acceptable. A two-year transitional period will apply to current producers. |
||||
Assessment |
||||
G4-HR9 |
Operations that have been subject to human rights reviews |
|
|
|
Supplier Human Rights Assessment |
||||
G4-HR10 |
Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using human rights criteria |
|
It is not currently possible to specify a percentage, due to the fact that data for new suppliers are not collected separately. Such data collection is planned for the future. |
|
Otherwise, all the suppliers of non-food own-brand products who produce goods (or have goods produced) in risk countries are obliged to name their respective producers and to present valid audits for all of them. It is only possible to carry out a new listing of suppliers if a valid BSCI audit (or equivalent) is presented with an acceptable result for the specific producer (see also the METRO GROUP internal policy). |
||||
G4-HR11 |
Significant human rights impacts in the supply chain |
|
a) All non-food own-brand producers used by us with a valid audit. At the reporting date of 30 September 2016, this was a total of 1,632 producers. |
|
b) Of these, the number of producers with a deal breaker result. In financial year 2015/16, this was a total of 195 producers. |
||||
c) A deal breaker result encompasses the aspects of child labour, forced labour, occupational health and safety – especially fire safety – and ethical behaviour. |
||||
d) Within the framework of the deal breaker process, non-food own-brand producers with a deal breaker result are obliged to rectify any shortcomings within six weeks. Until such time as the producer is able to prove that the shortcomings have been rectified and that they have sustainably improved their organisational processes, they will not receive any further orders. In financial year 2015/16, 12 per cent of non-food own-brand producers produced a deal breaker result. |
||||
e) In financial year 2015/16, 26 per cent of producers with a deal breaker result were unable to satisfactorily modify their organisational processes and were therefore temporarily blocked from receiving any further orders. |
||||
Societal Performance – Society
G4 Indicators |
Links within this report |
External links |
Comments |
|
Societal Performance: |
||||
Society |
||||
Management approach |
|
|
|
|
Anti-corruption |
||||
G4-SO3 |
Percentage of operations assessed for risks related to corruption and risks identified |
|
Annual Report 2015/16: |
All operating companies and service companies at METRO GROUP (excluding minority shareholding companies) are assessed for risks related to compliance, including corruption. |
METRO GROUP conducts compliance risk assessment workshops on an annual basis. During the workshops, various compliance risks – including corruption – are assessed in terms of loss potential and probability of occurrence within every entity. For the assessment, different risk scenarios have been provided. These include, for example, active or passive corruption involving different stakeholders, such as suppliers or public officials. The results of the risk assessment in the local entities are validated and consolidated at the corporate level as part of the corporate risk management process. |
||||
The business activities of METRO GROUP are subject to a wide range of statutory and self-imposed standards. Various legal requirements, as well as increased expectations among customers and the public that companies ensure compliance within their organisations, are resulting in more demanding requirements and greater complexity. In order to satisfy these requirements, METRO GROUP has established and continually developed a group-wide compliance management system. The aim is to systematically and permanently prevent regulatory violations within the organisation. METRO GROUP regularly identifies behavioural risks. |
||||
The main focus of our compliance management is on preventing corruption and antitrust risks. Corruption risks may exist in interactions with public institutions and officials, for example in the context of international expansion or approval procedures. They can also arise from business relations with suppliers and other business partners. In addition, the group-wide compliance management system also covers other relevant criminal and regulatory risks, data protection and risk areas concerning labour law, such as discrimination. |
||||
Taking into account the identified and assessed compliance risks, the necessary organisational structures are established within the framework of the compliance management system. The risks are steered and controlled consistently by the responsible departments within the existing structures. |
||||
In order to manage the identified compliance risks, METRO AG has introduced guidelines with a group-wide validity, including an antitrust manual, which provides, for example, work aids for supplier negotiations. It also includes sample formulations that are used for the purposes of antitrust-compliant communication with suppliers. In addition, METRO AG has introduced anti-corruption guidelines throughout the group, which include behavioural requirements for dealing with public institutions and officials on the one hand, and business partners on the other. The anti-corruption guidelines also require a compliance check for business partners in risk-related areas before entering into business relations. |
||||
G4-SO4 |
Communication and training on anti-corruption |
|
METRO GROUP has set up a training management and guidelines management process that is applicable for all operating companies and service companies (excluding minority shareholding companies) to facilitate compliance and the prevention of corruptive practices. Training management processes and guidelines management processes cover employees as well as governance body members and are applicable group-wide. |
|
Target groups for anti-corruption policies and procedures are defined according to content and organisational relevance. Distribution is carried out either via the designated IT tool or via the cascading of information through management. For training activities, target groups are defined using a risk-based approach based, for example, on the risk profile of the function or the job position. Both managers and employees are part of this approach. For supervised workers and non-permanent employees (temporary staff and workers on fixed-term contracts), a risk-oriented selection is made. The training management ensures that participation in training programmes is adequately tracked. For policies and procedures, acknowledgement is tracked by the tool. |
||||
New employees have received communications regarding anti-corruption policies and procedures within financial year 2015/16. Moreover, ongoing communication regarding anti-corruption policies takes place through internal communication channels such as the intranet and the social network. As no update of the existing anti-corruption policies has taken place, no separate communications were initiated via the designated IT tool. |
||||
Based on the results of the current compliance annual reporting, in 84 per cent of the operating companies and service companies taking part, training on anti-corruption had been conducted with more than 90 per cent of employees and executives (including governance body members) within financial year 2015/16. |
||||
In 16 per cent of the targeted entities, training on anti-corruption was conducted with less than 90 per cent of employees and executives within financial year 2015/16. Measures to optimise the training rates in these entities have been already set up. |
||||
Based on risk, all business partners have to complete a compliance business partner questionnaire (BPQ) before concluding a contract with METRO GROUP for the first time. Renewal of the BPQ is requested at regular intervals. The BPQ is focused on compliance-related topics and aims at identifying any indication of non-compliance on the supplier side. |
||||
We do not externally report on regions or issue breakdowns by employee category. |
||||
Anti-competitive Behavior |
||||
G4-SO7 |
Legal actions for anti-competitive behavior, anti-trust, and monopoly practices |
|
Annual Report 2015/16: |
Information on legal disputes, investigations and any other legal matters, and also on the potential risks or impacts for METRO GROUP, is contained in section 47. Other legal matters in the notes to the consolidated financial statements of METRO AG as of 30 September 2016. |
Only those legal matters that are of significance to the asset, financial and earnings position of the group or METRO AG are included in the reporting. The materiality principle for reporting is based on Section 315 of the German Commercial Code (HGB) in conjunction with German Accounting Standard no. 20 (GAS 20) with regards to the consolidated financial statements of METRO AG and on Section 289 HGB in conjunction with GAS 20 with regards to the separate financial statements of METRO AG. |
||||
Supplier Assessment for Impacts on Society |
||||
G4-SO9 |
Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using criteria for impacts on society |
|
We consider non-compliance with social standards, particularly poor labour conditions, to be among the main actual and potential significant negative impacts on society. We help combat such circumstances with our efforts in the field of social standards within our non-food own-brand production (Level 1 factories). As a result, we make reference here to our response to G4-LA14. |
|
G4-SO10 |
Negative impacts on society in the supply chain and actions taken |
|
We consider non-compliance with social standards, particularly poor labour conditions, to be among the main actual and potential significant negative impacts on society. We help combat such circumstances with our efforts in the field of social standards within our non-food own-brand production (Level 1 factories). As a result, we make reference here to our response to G4-LA15. |
|
Societal Performance – Product Responsibility
G4 Indicators |
Links within this report |
External links |
Comments |
|
Societal Performance: |
||||
Product Responsibility |
||||
Management approach |
|
|
||
Product and Service Labeling |
||||
G4-PR5 |
Results of surveys measuring customer satisfaction |
|
|
In addition to contact through our sales force, we survey our customers on a regular basis as part of the METRO Cash & Carry Customer Satisfaction Pulse initiative, in order to assess their satisfaction with the performance of the company. Each quarter, 100 customers are surveyed at every store. This includes querying their satisfaction with the product range and product availability, prices, cleanliness, the checkout experiences and store employees. In addition, customers are asked about whether they feel respected and whether they would recommend METRO to others. |
METRO Cash & Carry Germany also conducted a representative study among Horeca customers regarding the importance of sustainability issues in the food service industry. 500 people took part in the telephone survey conducted in June 2016. The survey found that 98 per cent of restaurateurs in Germany believed that it was very important or somewhat important that no food be wasted. This means that the issue of throwing away food is the top issue in the field of sustainability for the food service industry in Germany, ahead of saving energy (94 per cent), regionality (83 per cent) and animal welfare (also 83 per cent). |
||||
Every year, Real in Germany surveys approximately 25,000 of its own customers and approximately 5,800 customers of its competitors regarding their satisfaction. In recent years, satisfaction has been at 1.7 on a scale of 1 (highly satisfied) to 4 (highly dissatisfied). |
||||
In order to strengthen its contact with customers, in 2016 Media-Saturn established the Media Markt Club. In Germany alone, the club attracted more than 500,000 members in the first two months. Customers are also surveyed through the Media Markt Club, and customer satisfaction data are collected. |
||||
Customer opinions are also reflected in the results of our stakeholder survey. As a group of stakeholders, customers also had the opportunity here to assess the relevance of factors related to sustainability. |
||||